These are usually about an issue,
not about something you've done. Maybe one of the many thousand
discussions on the pros and cons of abortion, for instance.
They're largely popular because of
the adversarial views of the panel. Viewers like colour, contrast
and conflict.
But please remember that the conflict should be
about the subject - never the messenger.
Discussions are usually studio based,
and often in real time, not recorded.
Prepare three meaningful points as
usual, plus examples to back them up.
You'll probably be asked for a short
introductory piece to explain your stance. Put a lot of thinking
into making it short and sweet.
Watch and listen
carefully for time cues and try to get the last word. You might
see the floor manager
holding up two fingers. He's not being rude - he's telling the
interviewer there are two minutes left on the discussion. Or
the interviewer might say something like, "Well we're nearly
out of time . . ." Right. Get in there with your best point.
Even if it's a repeat. But if it is a repeat, illustrate it with
a different story.
The other chap may be talking, but
the camera might be looking at you. Indeed you can cause it to
look at you - almost any movement or gesture will put you on
air.
So use the camera.
How good an actor are you? You can sway the viewer very much
with your body language.
Sit up and listen to your opponent(s). But a pitying smile or
slight shake of the head, " Oh really, you can't expect
anybody in his right mind to think that way" can win hands
down for your side. Don't overdo it but, used wisely, this is
a very powerful weapon.
Next - Ambush!
